GrokSurf's San Diego

Local observations on water, environment, technology, law & politics

San Diego County’s water sources: assessing the options

Posted by George J Janczyn on July 20, 2010

A new study sponsored by the Equinox Center, and researched and produced by the Fermanian Business and Economic Institute, examines San Diego County’s water supply challenges and opportunities over the next 20 years as the region strives to maintain our quality of life while our population increases by 750,000 people.

At-a-glance report findings

  • Dependence on imported water (nearly 80% of the county’s current supply) is neither optimal nor sustainable, and is the least favorable water supply option. This is due to vulnerability caused by structural, legal and environmental issues that put its reliability and cost effectiveness at risk.
  • Conservation is and will remain the most favorable and least costly option over the next two decades. The extent to which it can reduce the region’s demand as the population continues to grow remains to be determined.
  • Recycled water, both potable and non-potable, has considerable potential to become a local, reliable source of water for the San Diego region.
  • At $2 million/mile, the cost of constructing the additional pipe infrastructure required to distribute nonpotable recycled water poses the largest constraint to increasing use of that source. In comparison, after advanced treatment, recycled potable water can be added to the existing infrastructure, making it a less expensive option.
  • Surface water and groundwater do not have the capacity to serve as significant sources for the region’s water requirements, although they have relatively favorable rankings.
  • Sea water desalination is the most costly and energy intensive of all options, rendering it a less favorable option despite its abundant water source.
  • Energy is used to produce all water sources, so the availability and cost of energy, as well as greenhouse gas emissions, makes energy use an important factor. Production of desalinated sea water uses significant energy at 4,100 to 5,100 kWh/acre foot. In contrast, recycled potable water uses 1500 – 2000kWh/AF and recycled non-potable water uses 600 to 1,000 kWh/AF.
  • San Diego County’s water future needs to be addressed from both the demand and the supply side. Pricing water closer to its true marginal costs will be necessary to manage this most valuable and scarce resource. Previous Equinox Center research revealed that appropriate water pricing can spur significant water conservation.

*San Diego County’s seven possible sources of water were ranked, without weighting, based on the following factors: marginal cost, energy intensity, legal, regulatory, environmental, technical, safety, social acceptance, availability and reliability. The results are detailed in the chart, where a “5” is the most favorable. See full report for details and description of ranking methodology.

 

The above summary is taken from San Diego Water Sources: Assessing the Options. Please find the time to view the whole report. Sponsored and published by the Equinox Center; researched and produced by the Fermanian Business & Economic Institute, copyright 2010 Equinox Center, San Diego, California; used with permission.

One Response to “San Diego County’s water sources: assessing the options”

  1. Burt Freeman said

    Interesting to see the current effort of Equinox Center on the many issues facing San Diego. The abstract from a previous Equinox report linked to the July 20, 2010 post containing Chart 6 (above), however, brings to mind much previous discussion in the comments section about its validity. It is unfortunate that the careful study of the cost of alternative water sources carried out by the San Diego County Water Authority was not presented. This September 15, 2010 report by Water Resource Manager Bob Yamada entitled Unit Cost of New Water Supply Alternatives offers a more quantitative and different result.

    All of us looking at various proposals for additional water supply know that the cost of water depends on a careful assessment of each specific proposal. Not only are the amortized cost of the process plant and operating cost major factors, but that of the water delivery infrastructure is significant as well.

    The potable water reuse Demonstration Project, which may lead to a City of San Diego conservation of some 10 million gallons per day from the North City Water Reclamation Plant, is not yet complete; earlier estimates resulted in a cost substantially greater than that of imported water. Water from another major supply source of 50 million gallons per day, the Carlsbad Desalination Plant, is currrently being negotiated; cost has not yet been determined, but is likely to be about the same.

    Evaluation of local water alternatives requires a complicated technical, system and financial assessment; best left to the experts.

Leave a comment

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s