<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: San Diego regional water news roundup Sep 1-7, 2012</title>
	<atom:link href="http://groksurf.com/2012/09/08/san-diego-regional-water-news-roundup-sep-1-7-2012/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://groksurf.com/2012/09/08/san-diego-regional-water-news-roundup-sep-1-7-2012/</link>
	<description>Local observations on water, environment, technology, law &#38; politics</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 22:05:24 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Burton Freeman</title>
		<link>http://groksurf.com/2012/09/08/san-diego-regional-water-news-roundup-sep-1-7-2012/#comment-5276</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Burton Freeman]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Sep 2012 15:54:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://groksurf.com/?p=20007#comment-5276</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Regarding the Imperial Valley Press article: &quot;In just a couple of weeks, the IID Board will decide how to proceed in developing a path forward for the QSA&quot;.

And San Diego County thought it had a diversified source for (about half of) its water supply!  What does a &quot;path forward&quot; imply?; renegotiating both the amount and the price?  In addition to IID issues about who will fallow and at what price?

In addition to currently recognized questions affecting Colorado water, about: future source amount and allocation from the Colorado River to California; demand for water to &quot;restore&quot; the Salton Sea; condition of and repairs to the Colorado Aqueduct; wheeling charges by MWD for water from the Colorado; litigation with MWD; etc.

In additon to vulnerability of Colorado River water delivery system to catastrophic events.

Is this safe and secure water through diversification?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Regarding the Imperial Valley Press article: &#8220;In just a couple of weeks, the IID Board will decide how to proceed in developing a path forward for the QSA&#8221;.</p>
<p>And San Diego County thought it had a diversified source for (about half of) its water supply!  What does a &#8220;path forward&#8221; imply?; renegotiating both the amount and the price?  In addition to IID issues about who will fallow and at what price?</p>
<p>In addition to currently recognized questions affecting Colorado water, about: future source amount and allocation from the Colorado River to California; demand for water to &#8220;restore&#8221; the Salton Sea; condition of and repairs to the Colorado Aqueduct; wheeling charges by MWD for water from the Colorado; litigation with MWD; etc.</p>
<p>In additon to vulnerability of Colorado River water delivery system to catastrophic events.</p>
<p>Is this safe and secure water through diversification?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
